Skip to main content
Quanta Report
PoliticsA three‑judge panel from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia circuit ruled that Donald Trump’s 2025 executive order excluding transgender personnel from military service likely violates their constitutional rights. The decision affirms a preliminary injunction granted by U.S. District Judge Ana Reyes and narrows it to active‑service plaintiffs, excluding those merely seeking enlistment. The ruling highlights conflicts between the order’s stated rationale and the legal protection of transgender service members, underscoring broader tensions between military policy and civil rights.

Court Overturns Trump Administration's Ban on Transgender Military Service

The U.S. Court of Appeals upholds a preliminary injunction declaring President Trump’s executive order that bars transgender soldiers unconstitutional, limiting the injunction to current service members.

Source: AP1 min read
Court Overturns Trump Administration's Ban on Transgender Military Service
Image via AP

In brief

In a landmark decision, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia circuit rejected the Trump administration’s ban on transgender military personnel. The ruling affirmed that the ban violated constitutional rights but narrowed the injunction to those currently serving, excluding applicants wishing to enlist.

WASHINGTON (AP) — A Trump administration policy that illegally banned transgender troops from military service was ruled against by a panel of federal appeal court judges on Monday.

The majority opinion, written by a three‑judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia circuit, upholds a March 2025 ruling by U.S. District Judge Ana Reyes in Washington, D.C. Reyes concluded that President Donald Trump’s executive order to exclude transgender troops from military service likely violates their constitutional rights.

The administration appealed after Reyes issued a preliminary injunction requested by attorneys for six transgender people who are active‑duty service members and two others seeking to join the military. The appeal court’s majority decided that the injunction should be narrowed to the plaintiffs currently serving in the military but not those seeking to join.

In January 2025, Trump signed an executive order that claims the sexual identity of transgender service members “conflicts with a soldier’s commitment to an honorable, truthful, and disciplined lifestyle, even in one’s personal life” and is harmful to military readiness.

In response to the order, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth issued a policy that presumptively disqualifies people with gender dysphoria from military service. Gender dysphoria is the distress that a person feels because their assigned gender and gender identity don’t match. The medical condition has been linked to depression and suicidal thoughts.

The policy “appears to be driven by the bare desire to harm a politically unpopular group: persons who identify as transgender,” Judge Robert Wilkins wrote for the majority. Wilkins was nominated to the bench by Democratic President Barack Obama.

Topics

More on this story