Campus Controversies Grow Over Epstein Ties: Removal of Wexner's Name

Thu Apr 02 2026 15:44:16 GMT+0000 (Coordinated Universal Time)

Protests are intensifying across several universities, including Ohio State and Harvard, calling for the removal of buildings named after billionaire Les Wexner due to his association with Jeffrey Epstein. Campus leaders are feeling the pressure as survivors, students, and faculty demand accountability.

Amid increasing scrutiny, activists at Ohio State University and other institutions are pressing for the removal of Les Wexner's name from campus buildings, citing his connections to Jeffrey Epstein. The movement reflects a broader trend in academia where associations with controversial figures are being challenged by students and alumni. As pressure mounts, universities are confronting the complexities of donor legacies and moral accountability.

COLUMBUS, Ohio (AP) — Students and activists at several universities are gathering for protests demanding the removal of billionaire retailer Les Wexner's name from university buildings due to his well-known ties to convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.

Across Ohio State University's campus, union nurses, former athletes, and students are uniting for the cause, seeking accountability among institutions that continue to honor Wexner despite his association with Epstein. The ongoing protests highlight a growing re-evaluation of naming rights tied to wealthy donors, particularly in light of recent scandals.

At Harvard University, a similar sentiment exists as groups within the Kennedy School seek to remove Wexner's name from buildings, citing his connections to Epstein as detrimental to the institution's integrity.

The backlash reveals a larger trend across numerous campuses decrying associations with Epstein and his network. Institutions are now facing moral dilemmas as they try to disentangle financial support from questionable legacies.

Critics argue that continuing to honor Wexner diminishes the voices of survivors and suggests a neglect for moral leadership, emphasizing the need for accountability from those at the helm of universities.

In response to mounting pressure, administrators have commented on the review processes for naming rights, although many argue that transparency is lacking. As students continue to push for change, the discourse around legacy and accountability is rapidly evolving, mirroring a societal demand for greater moral clarity in modern philanthropy.