Federal authorities announced an investigation into two immigration officers in Minnesota who allegedly made false statements under oath about a shooting incident. This comes after multiple shootings involving immigration agents where initial accounts were later contradicted by video evidence.
The recent probe was initiated following a federal judge's dismissal of felony assault charges against two Venezuelan men. Initially accused of attacking an officer, new video evidence prompted prosecutors to challenge the credibility of the claims made by immigration officials.
In recent months, five high-profile shooting cases involving immigration officials have raised substantial questions about the accuracy of law enforcement narrations. Each case features stark contrasts between the official statements and emerging video evidence.
Key Incidents Under Scrutiny
Julio Cesar Sosa-Celis Incident (Non-Fatal Shooting)
On January 14, 2026, federal officials initially claimed that Sosa-Celis had ambushed an immigration officer leading to a defensive shot fired by the officer. However, discrepancies in the officer's testimony compared to eyewitness accounts began to emerge during court proceedings.
Renee Good Incident (Fatal Shooting)
In another shooting incident on January 7, 2026, officials labeled the encounter as an act of domestic terrorism, claiming that Good attempted to ram her vehicle into officers. Contrary to this narrative, video evidence revealed Good was not aggressive at the time of the shooting.
Alex Pretti Incident (Fatal Shooting)
Another incident on January 24, 2026, involved Border Patrol agents and Pretti, who was described by officials as a violent threat. Released videos later suggested he was unarmed, challenging the justification for the shooting.
Silverio Villegas González Incident (Fatal Shooting)
In September 2025, the shooting of Villegas González was reported following an alleged reckless driving incident. Body cam footage contradicted the Department of Homeland Security's version of events, casting doubt on the claim that an officer was severely injured during the altercation.
Marimar Martinez Incident (Non-Fatal Shooting)
This case involved a shooting that was framed as a response to domestic terrorism, but subsequently released video evidence indicated significant flaws in the government’s narrative.
The investigation is expected to delve deeper into the discrepancies highlighted by video footage, urging a reevaluation of how immigration enforcement operations are conducted and reported.
