Controversy Surrounds DHS Plan for Warehouse Conversion to Immigrant Detention Centers

Thu Apr 09 2026 07:12:39 GMT+0000 (Coordinated Universal Time)

Homeland Security Secretary Markwayne Mullin reviews a contentious plan to convert warehouses into immigrant detention centers across the U.S., facing significant local opposition.

The U.S. Department of Homeland Security is under scrutiny as Secretary Markwayne Mullin evaluates a controversial initiative to repurpose warehouses into detention facilities for immigrants. Despite spending over a billion dollars on various properties, communities are rallying against the conversions, citing concerns over infrastructure, local resources, and lack of transparency from federal authorities.

Homeland Security Secretary Markwayne Mullin is reviewing a plan to transform warehouses across the U.S. into detention facilities for tens of thousands of immigrants.

Spending has already totaled $1.074 billion for 11 warehouses, but officials have faced substantial backlash. Days after Mullin’s appointment, the DHS paused the purchase of new warehouses amid scrutiny regarding contracts signed by his predecessor, Kristi Noem.

Details of specific locations, especially in Arizona, Florida, and Georgia, reveal concerns regarding community resources and infrastructure. Local officials indicate a lack of communication from DHS regarding these developments.

Local Impact of Warehouse Conversions

In Arizona, a 418,000 square-foot warehouse in Surprise purchased for $70 million aims to hold up to 1,500 detainees. However, the initial capacity is now projected to start with 250 per week, capping at 542.

Florida’s planned detention facility similarly faces uncertainty due to the absence of communication from DHS after a site visit by federal officials.

In Georgia, a $128.6 million warehouse is projected to hold between 7,500 to 10,000 individuals, leading to concerns about local water and sanitation capabilities.

These developments highlight a growing tension between federal immigration policies and community resources, with local governments increasingly vocal about their opposition to these plans.