Trial by Media: A Critical Review of Andrew Lownie's 'Entitled'

In a thought-provoking critique, Quanta Report offers a detailed examination of Andrew Lownie's recent publication, 'Entitled: The Rise and Fall of the House of York'. The book aims to present a forensic analysis of allegations surrounding Prince Andrew but falls short by neglecting crucial judicial processes.

The review emphasizes that the lack of a formal trial for Prince Andrew should not be overlooked or misrepresented. Lownie's narrative is criticized for transforming unproven allegations into established truths, thus undermining the necessary complexities of justice and legal accountability.

Moreover, as significant lawsuits continue in both London and the Eastern Caribbean—where many of the claims echoed in the book are currently contested—Lownie's work is said to ignore these realities largely. The critique points out that while many assertions are treated as settled, they remain very much in question within the court system.

The review describes the book's construction as reminiscent of algorithmic content creation. The sensationalistic approach leads to a cycle of repetition that bolsters claims without providing substantive evidence or context.

Ultimately, the critique argues that Lownie's work is less a contribution to historical understanding and more a demonstration of media trial where actual judicial inquiries are simultaneously occurring. The concluding remarks highlight the irresponsible nature of not addressing ongoing legal investigations, calling into question the accountability that Lownie purportedly aims to offer.