RICHMOND, Va. (AP) — A Virginia judge ruled Tuesday that a proposed constitutional amendment allowing Democrats to redraw the state’s congressional maps was illegal, jeopardizing their efforts to gain additional seats in the U.S. House for the upcoming midterm elections.
Tazewell Circuit Court Judge Jack Hurley Jr. struck down the legislature’s proposed amendment on several grounds: lawmakers did not follow established procedures for introducing the amendment during a special session; the amendment was not approved before the public began voting in the previous year's general election; and they also failed to publish the amendment three months ahead of the election, violating state law.
As a result, Judge Hurley declared the amendment invalid and void. Virginians for Fair Elections, the campaign advocating for the redistricting resolution, indicated that it would pursue an appeal. Campaign manager Keren Charles Dongo criticized the ruling, suggesting that Republicans were using litigation and misinformation as their primary strategies. She stated, “We’re prepared for what comes next, and Virginians deserve both the right to vote and the chance to level the playing field.”
This ruling comes amid a national trend of mid-decade redistricting battles, where Republicans have gained potential advantages in states like Texas, Missouri, North Carolina, and Ohio. Democrats, on the other hand, believe they can gain seats in California and Utah. Virginia was seen as a crucial battleground where Democrats hoped to recover the three-seat deficit they face nationally.
Ongoing litigation surrounding redistricting remains a contentious issue across several states, leaving uncertainty about seat distributions as parties scramble to secure their positions in an increasingly polarized political landscape.
Tazewell Circuit Court Judge Jack Hurley Jr. struck down the legislature’s proposed amendment on several grounds: lawmakers did not follow established procedures for introducing the amendment during a special session; the amendment was not approved before the public began voting in the previous year's general election; and they also failed to publish the amendment three months ahead of the election, violating state law.
As a result, Judge Hurley declared the amendment invalid and void. Virginians for Fair Elections, the campaign advocating for the redistricting resolution, indicated that it would pursue an appeal. Campaign manager Keren Charles Dongo criticized the ruling, suggesting that Republicans were using litigation and misinformation as their primary strategies. She stated, “We’re prepared for what comes next, and Virginians deserve both the right to vote and the chance to level the playing field.”
This ruling comes amid a national trend of mid-decade redistricting battles, where Republicans have gained potential advantages in states like Texas, Missouri, North Carolina, and Ohio. Democrats, on the other hand, believe they can gain seats in California and Utah. Virginia was seen as a crucial battleground where Democrats hoped to recover the three-seat deficit they face nationally.
Ongoing litigation surrounding redistricting remains a contentious issue across several states, leaving uncertainty about seat distributions as parties scramble to secure their positions in an increasingly polarized political landscape.
