Skip to main content
Quanta Report
PoliticsAn appeals court temporarily halted a lower court's ruling that prohibited President Trump from deploying Oregon's National Guard troops. The court's panel sided with the Justice Department, affirming the president's likely authority to federalize the troops amidst ongoing protests in Portland.

Trump's Plan to Deploy Oregon National Guard Troops Faces Legal Challenges

An appeals court has temporarily suspended a ruling that prevents President Trump from taking command of Oregon National Guard troops, although he remains barred from deploying them for now.

Source: AP1 min read
Trump's Plan to Deploy Oregon National Guard Troops Faces Legal Challenges
Image via AP

In brief

An appeals court ruling has temporarily stayed a lower court decision that prevented President Trump from calling up 200 Oregon National Guard troops. However, the court left in place an order blocking the actual deployment of those troops. The Justice Department may take further action to enable the deployment based on presidential authority.

PORTLAND, Ore.— An appeals court has put on hold a lower court ruling that barred President Donald Trump from commanding 200 Oregon National Guard troops. However, he is still prohibited from deploying them for the time being. This follows U.S. District Judge Karin Immergut's decisions earlier this month, which placed a temporary restraining order on Trump's actions. Trump's efforts to mobilize these troops come amid ongoing unrest and protests in Portland, raising substantial legal and constitutional questions related to the use of military forces in civilian settings. The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled 2-1 in favor of the administration's request for a suspension of the lower court's order, asserting that the president has significant leeway in determining troop deployment based on his assessment of law enforcement needs. Still, the court upheld the second order, which stops any immediate troop deployment, prompting discussions on whether the administration will seek its dissolution in light of military necessity. Oregon's Attorney General Dan Rayfield has indicated intentions to appeal the ruling, raising concerns over the president's authority and the implications for state sovereignty during civil unrest.

Topics

More on this story