CHICAGO (AP) — Many federal immigration enforcement officers in the Chicago area are equipped with body cameras, though officials testified in a recent hearing that additional funding from Congress is essential for broader implementation. This development comes in response to multiple complaints regarding combative tactics used during enforcement operations, particularly during protests.

U.S. District Judge Sara Ellis mandated that all uniformed agents activate body cameras when engaging in arrests, searches, or protests, spotlighting ongoing concerns regarding law enforcement's treatment of immigrants. The hearing included testimony from officials representing U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) and Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE).

According to Kyle Harvick, deputy incident commander with CBP, approximately 201 cameras are currently operational in the area. However, Shawn Byers, deputy field office director for ICE, noted that extending body camera usage beyond two field offices hinges on financial support from Congress. In areas like Broadview, where protests have escalated, no body cameras have been utilized by ICE personnel.

Towards the end of the hearing, Judge Ellis expressed her intentions to allow further inquiries aimed at understanding enforcement strategies better, including from officials leading these operations. The gathering was prompted by a lawsuit filed by news organizations and local community groups criticizing the aggressive tactics and suggesting an absence of accountability in immigration enforcement.

The impact of lack of transparency was emphasized when Ellis expressed shock at media reports depicting violent confrontations involving the use of tear gas against onlookers. Harvick defended this use by highlighting safety concerns for agents and detainees alike during chaotic situations.

While the Justice Department has countered claims of mismanagement, discussions around the optimal use of body cameras continue, urging for better oversight of immigration enforcement, as officials maintain that supportive legislative action is crucial for improvements.