Sweden's government is championing a renewed focus on physical books, paper and pens in classrooms, designed to reverse falling literacy levels. However, this back-to-basics approach has drawn criticism from tech companies, educators, and computer scientists, who argue it could impact pupils' employment prospects and potentially damage the Nordic nation's economy.
At a high school in Nacka, just outside Stockholm, students are unpacking laptops alongside items they used less frequently just a few years ago. I now go home from school with new books and papers often, says Sophie, 18, noting a shift in teaching methods towards textbooks and away from digital platforms.
The move contradicts Sweden's reputation as one of Europe's most technologically savvy societies, with high levels of digital skills and a thriving startup scene. The government now finds itself promoting a slogan of från skärm till pärm (from screen to binder), advocating for reduced screen time to foster better concentration and literacy skills.
The current right-wing coalition, which took power in 2022, is steering education towards traditional methods. Joar Forsell, an education spokesperson for the Liberal party, emphasizes the need to limit screen usage in younger classrooms. This aligns with a broader governmental initiative to improve literacy rates after Sweden's performance in international education rankings, particularly the OECD's PISA assessments, has seen a downturn.
Critics warn that reduced access to digital learning tools may leave future generations of Swedish pupils underprepared for an increasingly digital job market. A new report from the Swedish Edtech Industry highlights the risk of students lacking the necessary technological skills as workplaces evolve.
In a climate of mixed opinions among students, some advocate for increased digital education, arguing the necessity of computer skills in a modern world. The debates around this shift reflect broader issues of educational equity, the role of technology in learning, and the preparation of students for future challenges.
As Sweden embraces this controversial shift, the wider implications for economic innovation and competitiveness remain to be seen.





















