The day after the stunning jewelry heist at the Louvre in Paris, museum officials in Washington began assessing and fortifying their own security measures.

We conducted a thorough review of the incident, said Doug Beaver, security specialist at the National Museum of Women in the Arts. Beaver participated in discussions with various institutions, developing new strategies promptly following the heist.

Many museums are now worried: “Could that happen here?” While enhancing security is crucial, there lies a dilemma—how to protect valuable artworks without alienating visitors. The visitor experience is paramount, Beaver explained. “We want to ensure visitors feel welcome, not confined within a fortress.

The Louvre’s director, Laurence des Cars, acknowledged its recent breach as a significant lapse in security protocols, a sentiment echoed by French authorities.

A recent letter from 57 museums supporting the Louvre emphasized that museums should be places of openness rather than fortresses. However, historic buildings like the Louvre pose unique challenges in terms of security.

Amid these discussions, security expert Nicholas O'Donnell stressed the risk of focusing too narrowly on security threats rather than adopting a holistic approach that includes visitor interaction. This sentiment reflects a broader anxiety among museum professionals, who fear that necessary security measures could detract from the art-viewing experience.

Organizations like the Prussian Cultural Heritage Foundation are using the Louvre incident as a chance to reevaluate their own security architecture, underlining the international aspect of this ongoing dialogue.

Ultimately, Beaver believes that museums must strike a “necessary balance” between protecting art and maintaining accessibility. After all, the magic of museums lies in their capacity to engage the public, allowing them to marvel at centuries of art and culture.