Skip to main content
Quanta Report
ScienceGreece

Ancient Fabric Sparks Debate: Could It Have Belonged to Alexander the Great?

A newly revived claim suggests a piece of ancient fabric found in a tomb may actually be linked to Alexander the Great, challenging historical narratives.

By Lynsey ChutelSource: nytimes.com1 min read
Ancient Fabric Sparks Debate: Could It Have Belonged to Alexander the Great?
Image via nytimes.com

In brief

Recent research by paleoanthropologist Antonis Bartsiokas posits that a fragment of fabric discovered in a tomb in northern Greece could be a tunic worn by Alexander the Great, reigniting discussions about the tomb's true occupant and stirring controversy among archaeologists.

The discovery of a small piece of frayed purple-and-white fabric in a tomb in northern Greece has prompted a heated debate among archaeologists regarding its historical significance. Antonis Bartsiokas, a paleoanthropologist from Democritus University of Thrace, has suggested that this ancient fabric may have belonged to none other than Alexander the Great himself, rather than to his father, Philip II of Macedon, as was previously believed.The fabric, estimated to be over two thousand years old, emerged from a tomb that has been the subject of archaeological study since its discovery in 1977 by renowned archaeologist Manolis Andronicos. Andronicos firmly concluded that the tomb contained the remains of Philip II, a central figure in ancient Greek history whose military triumphs set the groundwork for his son Alexander’s legendary conquests across vast territories.In contrast, Bartsiokas asserts that the tomb housed the remains of Alexander's half brother, Arrhidaeus (Philip III), and includes items that belonged to Alexander, particularly a purple chiton—a type of tunic indicative of noble status in that era. Bartsiokas’s conclusions are based on new technological analyses, including interpretations of ancient friezes, suggesting a reexamination of the burial site's historical narrative.While the implications of confirming Bartsiokas’s claim could significantly alter the current understanding of this notable archaeological site, many in the Greek archaeological community remain skeptical. Critics argue that the claim lacks solid evidence and call for more comprehensive research before accepting such a groundbreaking assertion. The debate continues as scholars and archaeologists dissect the evidence in an attempt to uncover the truth behind this enigmatic piece of fabric and its potential connection to one of history’s most iconic figures.

Topics

More on this story