DEDHAM, Mass. — In a case that has captured the attention of the nation, the trial of Brian Walshe commenced on Monday as prosecutors detailed the grim circumstances surrounding the disappearance of his wife, Ana Walshe. She was last seen on January 1, 2023, shortly after a New Year's Eve celebration at their home, and her body has never been discovered.

Ana, originally from Serbia, was the primary provider for their family and remains unaccounted for more than two years later. Brian faces a charge of first-degree murder, building upon a prior guilty plea to lesser charges, including misleading police and the unlawful disposal of a human body.

Assistant District Attorney Gregory P. Connor stated in court that evidence will reveal Brian Walshe's online searches suggesting premeditated intent to harm his wife, including inquiries related to dismemberment and body disposal. Items discovered linked to the case included a hacksaw and a hatchet.

However, Brian's lawyer, Larry Tipton, countered that his client acted out of panic, claiming that Ana's death was sudden and unexplained, thus not a case of murder. Tipton tried to portray the couple's relationship as loving, indicating plans for their future before the New Year's tragedy.

Prosecutors have laid out a timeline of incriminating behavior following Ana's disappearance; they noted Brian's online searches for information on how long a body takes to begin emitting odors and the best tools for dismemberment. Suspicion grew when investigators found video footage of a man resembling Brian discarding heavy trash bags near their home.

Further complicating the case is the revelation of Ana's substantial life insurance policy, worth $2.7 million, which names Brian as the sole beneficiary. Amid these allegations, the couple's three young children are currently in state custody.

The courtroom drama could also be affected by ongoing scrutiny of the Massachusetts State Police, especially amid controversies involving their investigative methods in previous high-profile cases. This backdrop raises questions about the integrity of the evidence and testimonies presented during the trial.