Skip to main content
Quanta Report
PoliticsUnited StatesPanamaGreenlandMiddle East

Trump Teases Military Action to Secure Greenland and Panama Canal

In a contentious news conference, President-elect Trump lays out his controversial strategies for potential U.S. territorial expansion.

By Michael D. ShearSource: nytimes.com1 min read

In brief

In an hour-long address at Mar-a-Lago, President-elect Donald J. Trump hinted at using military or economic leverage to claim Greenland from Denmark and regain control of the Panama Canal. His remarks came filled with a mix of grievances, threats, and unfounded claims, showcasing a belligerent stance toward international diplomacy.

On January 7, 2025, President-elect Trump sparked significant controversy during a news conference at his Mar-a-Lago estate by suggesting he might resort to military or economic force to assert U.S. claims over Greenland and the Panama Canal. Trump's comments followed a series of grievances, where he also reiterated dire threats concerning the Middle East situation, particularly regarding hostages held by Hamas. “If they’re not back by the time I get into office, all hell will break out in the Middle East,” he declared repeatedly, emphasizing his unwavering stance. Throughout the press briefing, he referenced various grievances ranging from the Afghanistan withdrawal to ongoing criminal investigations against him, revealing a sense of urgency and discontent with current governmental dynamics.His controversial perspective on the Panama Canal—which was returned to Panama via treaty in the late 1990s—and his persistent talk of acquiring Greenland, a notion he first posited in 2019, underscore Trump's long-standing belief in expanding U.S. influence. “It might be that you'll have to do something,” Trump asserted when discussing the reassertion of U.S. control over these territories, aligning with his historical pattern of asserting dominance in property negotiations dating back to his business ventures in the 1980s.In summary, Trump's recent pronouncements reflect both a continuation of past rhetoric and a willingness to use aggressive means to secure U.S. interests abroad, raising eyebrows about future international relations under his administration.

Topics

More on this story