Internal communications reveal the Trump administration's decision to halt tens of millions in grants for research on environmental hazards, affecting ongoing studies focused on child health and toxic pollution.
Trump Administration's Environmental Research Grants Face Major Cuts

Trump Administration's Environmental Research Grants Face Major Cuts
The E.P.A. plans to cancel significant funding for vital environmental research aimed at protecting children's health, amidst broader dismantling of the agency's initiatives.
The Trump administration is reportedly gearing up to cut funding amounting to tens of millions of dollars for environmental research initiatives, particularly those aimed at safeguarding children's health against various environmental dangers. This decision stems from internal emails circulated among senior officials at the Environmental Protection Agency (E.P.A.), shedding light on the administration’s intent to diminish the agency’s core functions.
The cancellation of these grants adversely impacts research designed to address critical agricultural pollution issues, including pesticide exposure prevalent in rural areas. Furthermore, it puts at risk efforts to mitigate exposure to harmful wildfire smoke and tackle the contamination of the food supply by so-called "forever chemicals."
In an email dated April 15 from Dan Coogan, a deputy assistant administrator at the E.P.A., it was indicated that leadership directed staff to cancel all ongoing and pending grants associated with several key programs, including the Science to Achieve Results (STAR) initiative. The email highlights that grant funding geared towards environmental solutions, particularly under the People, Prosperity and the Planet (P3) program, which has supported various innovative projects by students, is also facing termination.
These developments raise concerns about the future of independent environmental research and its implications for public health, particularly for vulnerable populations such as children. These cuts not only hinder scientific progress but could have lasting negative impacts on the health and environment of communities already facing significant challenges.