California is embroiled in unrest as protests flare against military presence ordered by President Trump amid deportation roundups, prompting state leaders to initiate legal proceedings.
Trump's Military Surge in California Sparks Protests and Legal Action

Trump's Military Surge in California Sparks Protests and Legal Action
Growing tensions in Los Angeles as California officials take action against the President's military deployment
Tensions escalated dramatically in downtown Los Angeles last night, igniting a series of protests against President Trump's recent decision to order a significant increase in military forces deployed to the area. Originally marked by a peaceful atmosphere, the protests swiftly transformed into conflict after the administration doubled the military presence, bringing the total to around 4,700 troops including 700 active-duty Marines.
Law enforcement officials resorted to deploying flash bangs and foam rounds to disperse protesters gathered near a federal building. As darkness fell, the National Guard and police clad in full riot gear encircled the vicinity, forcing demonstrators to spread out to surrounding neighborhoods, including Little Tokyo. Live updates have emerged detailing the heightened confrontations and ongoing protests.
California's top political figures have openly challenged the Trump administration's actions. In a noteworthy development, state leaders declared their intention to file a lawsuit against the President in response to his military deployments, signaling a significant clash between state and federal authorities.
As chaos unfolded, several journalists covering the protests reported injuries. Lauren Tomasi from 9News Australia, a CNN affiliate, suffered injuries when struck by a nonlethal projectile while broadcasting live. Another journalist from the Times sustained minor injuries under similar circumstances and required hospital treatment.
In other governmental news, Robert F. Kennedy Jr., the U.S. health secretary, undertook the controversial action of dismissing all 17 members of the advisory committee on immunization at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, arguing that such a move would enhance public confidence in vaccines.