Skip to main content
Quanta Report
PoliticsDenmark, Greenland, Panama, South Korea

Foreign Governments Turn to K Street Amid Trump’s Second Term

As President Trump begins a second term, foreign nations seek lobbyists with connections to navigate the uncertainties of his confrontational policies.

By Kenneth P. VogelSource: nytimes.com1 min read
Foreign Governments Turn to K Street Amid Trump’s Second Term
Image via nytimes.com

In brief

In response to President Trump’s aggressive foreign policy stance, countries like Denmark, Panama, and South Korea are hiring lobbyists with ties to the administration to address potential threats from tariffs and acquisitions.

As President Trump embarks on a second term, foreign governments are scrambling to secure lobbying support from firms with close ties to the administration. Notably, Denmark, which has not typically invested heavily in Washington’s lobbying scene, recently initiated efforts to find a lobbyist with connections to Trump. This is in light of Trump’s expressed interest in Greenland and could signal a shift in how countries engage with U.S. politics.Denmark is not standing alone. Various nations, including Panama and South Korea, are also seeking lobbying assistance to mitigate the risks of Trump’s policies, which threaten tariffs, reduced aid, and even territorial acquisitions. Panama has already signed a lucrative contract to ally with prominent lobbyist and Trump supporter David Urban shortly before the president's inauguration, in a bid to safeguard interests regarding the Panama Canal.Similarly, South Korea has expanded its lobbying efforts to include former Trump campaign advisor Bryan Lanza, reflecting the urgency felt by allies regarding potential tariffs. As tensions rise, as evidenced by a recent tariff confrontation with Colombia, foreign governments grapple with the unpredictability of Trump's administration.The rush to engage lobbyists highlights a broader narrative of foreign nations adapting to a new landscape under a confrontational U.S. policy, where traditional alliances could be tested as they try to proactively navigate potential conflicts and shifts in U.S. foreign relations.

Topics

More on this story