NEW YORK – Victims of Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell are advocating for the unsealing of court records related to their federal sex trafficking cases, emphasizing that transparency is critical for justice. Annie Farmer, a primary victim, made her plea through attorney Sigrid S. McCawley.


Following the passing of the Epstein Files Transparency Act, signed by President Donald Trump, the victims are pushing for the government to make previously sealed documentation available by December 19. Their call for unsealing these records comes at a time when the Justice Department has requested the lifting of secrecy orders on grand jury transcripts and other vital materials pertaining to both Epstein's 2019 case and Maxwell's 2021 trial.


McCawley stated in a letter to the judges that nothing should hinder the victims' pursuit of justice or allow for ongoing concealment of one of history's most notorious sex trafficking operations.


The Attorney General's request aims to lift secrecy on records, including search warrants and financial documents gathered during the investigation phases. However, Maxwell’s defense raised concerns that releasing these materials could prejudice her pending habeas corpus petition, aimed at overturning her conviction related to sex trafficking minors.


As the judicial system reviews these requests, it remains to be seen how forthcoming it will be with such sensitive information and what implications these decisions will have on the victim's rights and Maxwell's legal battles.


Federal judges Richard M. Berman and Paul A. Engelmayer are currently deliberating on these matters and are set to provide rulings soon. Meanwhile, Epstein's estate has also articulated its neutral stance regarding the unsealing request, relying on the government's assurance to protect victims’ identities during the process.


Reports indicated that prior efforts by various committees to release Epstein-related documents had failed to adequately protect victims' identities, raising serious concerns about their privacy and safety. This aspect of the discussion is still under scrutiny as the legal processes unfold.