Welcome to the shutdown, 2025 edition. On Tuesday evening, the US Senate was unable to pass a spending bill that would have kept the US government funded, and for the first time in nearly seven years, federal operations have been drastically curtailed.
At some point, this shutdown – like all the ones before it - will end. It may take days; it may take weeks, but eventually, as public pressure and political pain grows, one side or the other will yield.
Here are four scenarios for how that might play out.
Democrats quickly break ranks
Senate Democrats shot down a Republican spending bill that would have kept the government operating until November, but that vote may have contained the seeds of their defeat. While forty-four Democrats (and Republican iconoclast Rand Paul) voted no, two Democrats and one Democrat-allied independent sided with the Republican majority.
Independent Angus King of Maine is always a bit of a wildcard. John Fetterman of Pennsylvania has been charting his own path for nearly a year. But Catherine Cortez Masto of Nevada, while not a liberal firebrand, is not your typical political maverick. She is, however, up for re-election next year in a state that Donald Trump carried in 2024, which has been slowly trending Republican for years.
In her statement explaining her vote, she expressed concern about the economic toll government closure would have on Nevada, echoing worries that a prolonged shutdown could harm her political prospects.
Democrats in battleground states like Georgia, Virginia, and Colorado may also feel the heat, and mounting pressure could lead to more defections that might end the shutdown, regardless of party discipline.
Democrats back down
Even if the Democrats stay (relatively) united, the pressure on them to abandon the fight is likely to increase as the shutdown drags on. Government employees, a key constituency, feel the immediate pain from delayed paychecks. The American public will soon feel the impact through curtailed services and economic hardships, leading to increased public blame directed at the Democrats.
As the public begins to react negatively, Democrats may view cutting their losses as a viable option to limit political fallout, using the shutdown to highlight issues surrounding health insurance and government program cuts.
Republicans make concessions
Currently, Republicans appear confident in their position, but should they miscalculate and deepen public dissatisfaction, they might consider concessions. Facilitating extension of health-insurance subsidies could help alleviate some public pressure and shift blame from the GOP.
This concession might also resuscitate their electoral prospects, providing a path for both parties to negotiate an end to the shutdown.
The shutdown stretches on (and both sides lose)
Amidst partisanship and accusations, an extended shutdown risks upsetting the balance of public opinion against both parties. A record-length shutdown could wreak havoc on economic stability, with the potential for looming dissatisfaction reflected in voters' choices in the following election cycle.
If the current climate of acrimony persists, both parties could face backlash, setting the stage for drastic political changes in future elections. This situation exemplifies the cyclical nature of American politics, where the quest for a resolution remains an ongoing challenge.