In brief
A federal judge in New Mexico has fined Meta $25bn for a decade‑long pattern of deceptive statements about how it treats user data. The decision follows a two‑week trial that revealed senior executives, including Mark Zuckerberg, crafted communications designed to mislead the public. While the calculation of penalty could have reached $219bn, the court capped it at $25bn. This penalty is the largest yet imposed on Meta, which has already faced several other sizable settlements this year. The judgment underscores the mounting scrutiny of tech giants’ data‑protection practices.
The company behind Facebook, Instagram and WhatsApp has been hit with another massive fine for its business practices.
A federal judge in New Mexico on Wednesday ordered Meta to pay $25bn (£18.6bn) following a two‑week trial earlier this year that found it had for years intentionally lied to the public about the way it handled and controlled Facebook user data.
“The lies extend beyond Facebook's data practices as well,” the judge said, adding it went to “the heart of its core business practices.”
The fine is the largest to date against Meta, which has either been fined or agreed to settle several other lawsuits this year, including an $18bn deal with California.
Communications between senior executives, including Mark Zuckerberg, were “designed to mislead the public,” Judge Francis Mathew wrote in his order.
While the full amount of the penalty against Meta, based on thousands of violations of state law, was calculated as $219bn, Judge Mathew reduced the penalty to the $25bn fine.
A spokesperson for Meta did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
