ICC suspends top prosecutor amid misconduct probe

Sat Jun 13 2026 12:57:15 GMT+0000 (Coordinated Universal Time)

The International Criminal Court suspends chief prosecutor Karim Khan while investigations into sexual misconduct allegations continue.

The ICC has suspended chief prosecutor Karim Khan following an investigation into allegations of sexual misconduct. The decision, made by the Oversight Bureau, will be reviewed by the 125 member states. Khan has denied the charges and his lawyers claim the process is unlawful. The case is the latest controversy that could affect the ICC’s credibility and international relations. The outcome will be decided in a special session soon.

ICC suspends top prosecutor amid misconduct probe

The International Criminal Court suspended chief prosecutor Karim Khan with immediate effect while an investigation into alleged sexual misconduct continues.

The Oversight Bureau referred the matter to the 125 member states, which will vote on Khan’s future during a forthcoming special session.

Khan denied all allegations and his lawyers describe the suspension as unlawful, procedurally unfair, and unsupported by evidence.

Initial reports in May 2024 cited a document claiming unwanted sexual touching and abuse. A second referral in October 2024 led to a broader UN Office of Internal Oversight Services inquiry that produced over 5,000 pages of evidence.

The findings were reviewed by a panel of judges to determine the severity of Khan’s conduct. A two‑thirds majority is required to uphold any findings, followed by a separate vote to determine removal.

Khan has been on voluntary leave since May 2025, and supporters argue the investigation failed to substantiate claims. Critics warn that his return could undermine confidence in the ICC.

The controversy coincides with broader tensions surrounding the court, including US sanctions imposed after Khan sought arrest warrants for Israeli leaders. Potential removal could trigger legal challenges in the ILOAT tribunal, with possible reinstatement and compensation if disciplinary processes are found flawed.

For more on the ICC’s work see our related articles.