Federal Judge Warns Trump Officials Over Inflammatory Comments in Immigration Case

Mon Nov 10 2025 23:10:24 GMT+0200 (Eastern European Standard Time)

A federal district judge in Tennessee has issued a warning to former Trump administration officials regarding their public statements about Kilmar Abrego Garcia, who is facing legal proceedings following his controversial deportation.

U.S. District Judge Waverly Crenshaw has cautioned officials from the Trump administration against making prejudicial public statements regarding Kilmar Abrego Garcia's ongoing trial. The judge's order reminds that such statements could result in sanctions. Garcia, whose wrongful deportation ignited controversy, is accused of human smuggling and has pleaded not guilty. The judge highlighted the potential impact of inflammatory remarks on Abrego Garcia's right to a fair trial.

NASHVILLE, Tenn. — A federal judge in Tennessee has expressed his intention to impose potential sanctions on former Trump administration officials if they persist in making inflammatory public statements regarding Kilmar Abrego Garcia, whose trial is forthcoming.

U.S. District Judge Waverly Crenshaw filed an order on Monday mandating local prosecutors in Nashville to forward a copy of his opinion to all Justice Department and Department of Homeland Security employees, including Attorney General Pam Bondi and DHS Secretary Kristi Noem.

In the order, Judge Crenshaw noted, “Government employees have made extrajudicial statements that are troubling, especially where many of them are exaggerated if not simply inaccurate.” He specified that these statements could significantly prejudice Garcia’s case.

The judge cited local court rules that prohibit comments concerning the “character, credibility, reputation, or criminal record of a party,” as well as any expressions of opinion about the accused’s guilt or innocence.

Judge Crenshaw warned that those who failed to comply with these guidelines might face sanctions, reinforcing the standard for maintaining the integrity of the judicial process.

Earlier this year, Garcia’s unjust deportation to El Salvador, where he was detained in a notoriously brutal prison despite having no criminal record, led to increased criticism of the Trump administration’s immigration policies. Under judicial pressure, officials repatriated him to the U.S. in June but subsequently issued a warrant for his arrest on human smuggling charges in Tennessee. Garcia has pleaded not guilty to the charges and seeks their dismissal.

Meanwhile, Trump administration officials have mounted a persistent public relations campaign against Garcia, branding him as a member of the MS-13 gang and even accusing him of involvement in a murder. Judge Crenshaw’s opinion highlighted several such statements by officials, including Bondi and Noem, which could jeopardize Garcia’s right to a fair trial. He also criticized Garcia’s defense for disclosing plea agreement details publicly.

Garcia has lived in Maryland for years with his U.S. citizen wife and child after immigrating to the U.S. illegally from El Salvador as a teenager. In 2019, an immigration judge acknowledged his well-founded fear of violence from gangs targeting his family and granted him legal protection from deportation. Since his return, ICE has announced intentions to deport him to various African countries, with Liberia being the most recent destination discussed.