Australia could use a variety of technologies to enforce its social media ban on under-16s, but each method presents unique risks, according to a new report. The government’s initiative, set to take effect in December, aims to curb the negative impacts of social media on children and has gained international attention.
The regulations require platforms to implement 'reasonable steps' to prevent kids from setting up accounts and to deactivate existing ones. While many parents support the ban, there are rising concerns regarding data privacy and the reliability of age verification technologies.
The report, commissioned by Australia’s federal government and conducted by the UK-based Age Check Certification Scheme, evaluates various enforcement methods such as government document verification, parental consent, and advanced technologies that assess age via facial features. All methods were deemed technically feasible.
However, the analysis found no singular solution that would be effective across all platforms and scenarios. It indicated that identity document verification is the most accurate approach but poses privacy risks if data is retained longer than necessary. Recent data breaches in Australia highlight the dangers of potential misuse of sensitive information.
While facial recognition technology was noted to be 92% accurate for individuals aged 18 and up, it struggles with those just above or below the age of 16, risking significant inaccuracies in age verification.
The findings suggest a layered approach combining multiple verification techniques would be most effective. Communications Minister Anika Wells emphasized that tech companies must utilize their resources to protect children online, stating, 'There is no excuse for social media platforms not to have a combination of age assurance methods ready by December 10.'
Penalties for non-compliance could reach A$50 million ($32.5 million). Platforms like Facebook, Instagram, Snapchat, and YouTube are directly impacted by these new regulations. While polls indicate widespread support from Australian adults regarding this ban, some mental health advocates warn of potential isolation effects or the risk of pushing minors toward unregulated online environments.
Critics suggest a focus on enhancing oversight of harmful content rather than cutting off children's access altogether is necessary to prepare young users for the challenges of navigating the online world.
