Greenland’s Prime Minister Jens-Frederick Nielsen has firmly responded to US President Donald Trump's persistent discussions around the Arctic island's ownership, asserting that it is neither a property for sale nor a territory for annexation.
Greenland's PM Rejects Trump's Claims of Ownership Amid Rising Tensions

Greenland's PM Rejects Trump's Claims of Ownership Amid Rising Tensions
In response to Trump's controversial remarks, Greenland's Prime Minister emphasizes the island's autonomous status and the need for respect in international relations.
During a diplomatic visit to Copenhagen this weekend, Nielsen, who took office in April, made clear that Greenland will not be treated as a commodity subject to purchase. In a show of solidarity with Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen, he addressed the "disrespectful" rhetoric coming from the US regarding Greenland’s sovereignty.
Trump’s assertion that control of Greenland is vital for US national security has sparked outrage across both Denmark and Greenland. The controversial idea of purchasing the island was notably voiced by Trump, who suggested that military intervention could be an option. However, US Vice-President JD Vance, while visiting Greenland recently, commented that military force wouldn’t be necessary, despite acknowledging Trump’s ambitions for the territory.
Nielsen underscored the importance of cooperation, stating that while Greenland is open to enhancing ties with the US, respect must underlie any partnership. His stance was mingled with a display of common purpose with Frederiksen, who emphasized to Trump during her own visit to Greenland that annexing countries is unacceptable.
A significant point of contention remains as polls indicate that most Greenlanders wished to steer towards independence from Denmark rather than align with the US. As Greenland grapples with its identity, the new coalition government led by Nielsen’s center-right Democrat party advocates for a gradual approach to autonomy.
With Denmark and Greenland united against the threatening undertones of US policies, the future trajectory concerning Greenland’s political status remains a matter of careful navigation on the international stage.