Following U.S. strikes on Iranian nuclear sites, global response is mixed, with many leaders expressing alarm and calling for de-escalation to avert further conflict in the Middle East.
Global Reactions to U.S. Military Strikes on Iran: Calls for Diplomacy and De-escalation

Global Reactions to U.S. Military Strikes on Iran: Calls for Diplomacy and De-escalation
As the consequences of the U.S. military's actions in Iran unfold, international leaders voice strong concerns and advocate for peaceful resolutions.
American allies and adversaries reacted swiftly to the U.S. military strikes on three nuclear sites in Iran, which mark a significant escalation in the ongoing conflicts in the region, particularly those surrounding Israel. Both condemnation and calls for diplomacy emerged as fears grew that the attacks could set off more severe confrontations across the Middle East.
Notably, United Nations Secretary-General António Guterres expressed grave concern about the implications of the strikes. He characterized the military actions as a “dangerous escalation” that threatens international peace and security. Guterres pointed out the increased risk of a conflict spiraling out of control, warning of potential catastrophic consequences for civilians and the broader region.
In Britain, Prime Minister Keir Starmer defended the U.S. actions, asserting that Iran should never be allowed to develop nuclear weapons. He encouraged Iran to return to diplomatic negotiations to resolve existing tensions. Australia's government echoed similar sentiments while emphasizing the importance of de-escalation, reiterating concerns over Iran's nuclear program as a regional threat.
Across the Pacific, New Zealand's Foreign Minister Winston Peters called for restraint, emphasizing the urgent need to avoid further military escalation in the Middle East. South Korea's top security officials convened to evaluate the potential ripple effects of the U.S. strikes on national security and economic stability.
Meanwhile, Mexico's Foreign Ministry advocated for diplomatic dialogue, urging all parties involved to de-escalate the ongoing tensions. In stark contrast, Cuban President Miguel Díaz-Canel condemned the strikes as a dangerous escalation that risks drawing the world into a larger crisis.
Responses from South American leaders also reflected a strong rejection of the U.S. action, with Chile’s President Gabriel Boric labeling the strikes illegal under international law, and Venezuela's Foreign Minister Yván Gil denouncing them as an “unjustifiable” act of aggression.
As international leaders work to navigate these escalating tensions, the overarching sentiment remains clear: a call for dialogue and peaceful solutions in a volatile region.