**Three Convicted in Blackmail Case Against Michael Schumacher's Family**

**The convicted individuals face varying sentences for a scheme involving sensitive personal files belonging to the former F1 champion, whose health has been a closely guarded secret since a severe skiing accident in 2013.**

In a dramatic courtroom ruling, three men have been found guilty of plotting to blackmail the family of renowned Formula 1 driver Michael Schumacher, who has been out of the public eye since sustaining grave brain injuries in a skiing accident nearly a decade ago. The main defendant, Yilmaz T, aged 53, has been sentenced to three years in prison after he attempted to extort €15 million (approximately £12 million) by threatening to release 900 personal photographs, nearly 600 videos, and confidential medical records onto the dark web.

Yilmaz's son, only 30, received a six-month suspended sentence after admitting to aiding in the extortion efforts. A third accomplice, Markus F, a former security guard employed at the Schumacher residence who denied participating, received a two-year suspended sentence. The Schumacher family has kept Michael's medical condition under wraps since the accident, which has led to intense public interest in his well-being.

Yilmaz, during his trial, acknowledged the heinousness of his actions, stating, "What I did was very, very disgusting." He admitted that he had received the sensitive files from Markus F, who reportedly offered them for a "five-figure sum." Notably, one of the hard drives allegedly containing these files has not yet been recovered.

The presiding judge held Markus F accountable for enabling the extortion plot, suggesting that he could have prevented the situation from escalating. Following the revelation of the blackmail, the Schumacher family contacted Swiss authorities, who subsequently tracked the suspects to Germany, leading to their arrest in June 2024.

The lawyer representing the Schumacher family, Thilo Damm, criticized the leniency of the sentences, marking this breach of trust as an "ultimate betrayal." He confirmed that they intend to appeal the court's decision, emphasizing their distrust regarding the whereabouts of the missing hard drive. "We are unaware of its location," Damm stated, "raising the possibility of further threats lurking."